5th September 2012

Aegon: We must sell the value we add?

For months the industry has been talking about the need to ensure each advisory firm has a tangible and transparent client proposition for RDR. However, when we have that how do we make sure clients will pay for it?

If we take the findings from the latest JP Morgan Asset Management report this is one of the greatest challenges facing our profession.

The report from JP Morgan entitled Winning propositions: The consumer market post-RDR, looks at the appetite among UK consumers for fee-based advice, and the different advice services likely to appeal to consumers seeking advice.
JP Morgan based its findings on a survey of 2,028 individuals with a gross household income of over £50,000, having previously established that a gross household income of £55,000 is the tipping point where consumers become significantly more interested in taking advice.

The company also carried out one-to-one interviews with adviser firms that have established successful fee-based models. The key findings make stark reading it found that:

  • 13 per cent of respondents were likely to seek out an ongoing fee-based service, but found 40 per cent were prepared to pay for task-based advice services.
  • More than 80 per cent of those surveyed said they would seek professional advice to some degree, while only 19 per cent wanted to transact on a purely non-advised basis.
  • Some 75 per cent of respondents had used an adviser in the past. JP Morgan found that interest in using a professional adviser peaks among individuals with a household income of £150,000 to £250,000.
  • Retirement planning was identified as a key driver for advice for 75 per cent of those surveyed. 25 per cent said they were confident enough to research and set up a pension plan for themselves.
  • Clients would be most willing to pay a fee to an adviser who is proactive in managing ongoing portfolio adjustments, and provides regular reports and early warnings of market volatility and financial events.
     

One fact that struck me most was that the way in which clients wish to deal with advisers is rapidly changing as we embrace the second industrial revolution. The report found that Clients preferred to contact their adviser through email, with face-to-face meetings as a secondary preference.

I would urge everyone to read this excellent report and to ensure that no matter what proposition you develop for your business post RDR you ensure that you sell the value you add to clients.

I fundamentally believe that the JP Morgan research highlights the fact our profession has been negligent in shouting from the roof tops the value we have added. For to many years because of the crutch of commission we have kept quite about all the work we have done for clients and a perception has evolved that advisers do what they do for nothing!
We must rail against this perception. It must be changed. We as a profession must now start talking about the experience, empathy, expertise and solutions we can provide and clients must be aware that these are valuable commodities that have a deserved cost attached to them.

We have interesting times ahead, but I am convinced, that if we can define and articulate the value we add then we can ensure that more and more of our clients will be happy to pay for this. To see how AEGON can help visit our client proposition area on our business brain website.
 

John Joe McGinley 
Head of Business Brain AEGON

 

RDR

Registration

Free Registration and CPD

Related Articles_

Axa Wealth: What did the RDR ever do for us?


Schroders' research reveals a significant number of advisers outsourcing their investment process since the RDR – Stuart Podmore examines the findings.

Read More

Who is actually responsible for the RDR mass-market advice mess?


It was Sir Callum McCarthy's infamous ‘Gleneagles speech in September 2006’ which laid the groundwork for the overhaul of the UK financial services retail distribution business model, something now referred to as the ‘RDR’.

Read More

RDR learnings


At the beginning of August, the ‘You could not make it up” season got well underway with HM Treasury and the FCA launching a review to examine how to plug the advice gap (their own regulatory actions had caused). Well, they missed that last bit out in the announcement.

Read More

Login

Not yet registered?

Please complete this form to join our community

Name
Email
Company
Select your role:
Password
Confirm Password